Not quite. I said that was the main difference, but if we go into details, the physics of the thing, it’s a bit more complicated. The guy who invented the aeropress, afaik, tried to make a handmade espresso replacement. He didn’t succeed, but the way the aeropress works is a hybrid of immersion, percolation and pressure brewer, whereas the french press is all about immersion and that it’s. It has the plunger, but that’s for filtering, nothing else.

If anything, I think the aeropress is closer to a moka pot than anything. But it’s its own thing, honestly.

Yep

It took this thread to convince me that the people making posts about Lemmy being too negative were right.

Oh, no. It’s not oily. Just a bit thicker. Like espresso. That’s partly because of the oils that coffee has.

Main difference is the fact that the aeropress uses a paper filter which filters out sediment and oils giving the coffee a “cleaner” taste. From my research before I bought it, I remember it also being slightly healthier because, again, you filter out those oils.

Elections are this sunday. Nobody’s been elected yet.

Ihsahn - mass darkness

The crown - death explosion

High on fire - fury whip

Skeletonwitch - and into the flame

Goatwhore - FBS

Death - painkiller (all the respect to priest, but this version is better)

Exodus - war is my shepherd

Machine head - aesthetics of hate

Destroyer 666 - I am the wargod

The ocean - jurrasic/cretaceous

Black tongue - eclipse

Kglw - supercell/dragon/self-immolate

Hatebreed - destroy everything

Yeah, I guess that’s fair. Religion and history are so intertwined when it comes to this subject that it’s easy to dismiss sources as biased, which is what’s happening here. Still not convinced they should be dismissed in this case

So instead of taking the glory for themselves like pretty much all other humans they decide to preach about an imaginary friend? Meh… Between “guy who got lost in history” and “bunch of guys that raved about that one gf that went to a different school”, I’ll go with the former as the more plausible one.

I’ll concede the fact that it’s not the same level of proof as other figures, but all these people writing about him is more than we have about others.

Ah, okay. But then we can’t really make a claim either way, can we? We don’t really know who he was or who he claimed to be.

Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily, I say unto you, Before Abraham was, I am. John 8:58

Which is from one of the original 4 gospels. Apparently there’s evidence of it being written as early as 70AD. There’s a couple other quotes I found in a link some other person linked in this thread but this one seems most direct.

One simple one was one apostle saying Jesus told them to go barefoot and with no staff and another saying he told them staff + sandals.

Don’t believe in god either way, but if it’s good enough for the majority of historians , then it’s good enough for me. Not sure why you’d need more, but you do you.

What about all the other ones? There’s dozens. Including ones where there’s no room for interpretation like with those ones.

Exactly this. The person did exist. There’s proof of that. It wasn’t the son of god and didn’t perform miracles, but he was real nonetheless.

Ofc there are. Unless they got destroyed someway or another. There was a guy named Jesus that was crucified by the romans and all that. There is proof of that. It’s all the biblical stuff that there’s no proof of.

What makes you say that about nice? Been there many times and I’m not a fan of the city, but for other reasons. I’d have imagined a far right shithole to be…whiter, if nothing else.

Can’t find the original anymore as it’s been a few years, but there was this post on reddit about a street view car in Marseille. This is an article covering the thing. Nobody claimed it was fake at the time. Showed it to people that used to live in Marseille and they didn’t seem surprised either.

I mean the actual city, not the stuff around it. Mostly because there’s a lot of gangs and thieves and such. There’s actually a few streets that ste fully controlled by gangs afaik. Like barricades made out of couches and shit and ambulances need an escort to get in and such.

Otherwise yeah, Aix, Cassis, and most of Provence are awesome.

Nothing happens to them because all the bad parts of Romania aren’t in places where backpackers would go. Only “bad” part of visiting Romania is that tourism isn’t as developed as in other countries. So not as many signs/information/buses to and from places. That also makes lots of places harder to find and reach but also a lot more pristine. Romania’s countryside is one of the best, hands down.